Perceptions of choice in writing of university students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2023.15.02.03Keywords:
writing motivation, writing instruction, university students, argumentative writing, choiceAbstract
There is an assumption in education that allowing students to choose their writing topics and positions is beneficial; however, there is little research to support this belief, particularly from the students’ perspectives. In the present study, we conducted 20 semi-structured interviews with students at a large university in the Southwest of the United States after they completed two in-class argumentative writing assignments in a course on exceptional children, one where they chose their writing position and one where they were assigned their writing position. As a group, these 20 students (13 female, 7 male) were above average writers in their first to third year of study, and the majority of them were education majors (70%), followed by arts and sciences (25%), and design and the arts (5%). The interview protocol focused upon their shifting perspectives on the underlying motivational construct of choice related to this and other writing assignments. Taking a grounded theory approach to thematic analysis, findings indicated that having choice in writing was important because it allowed students to write about topics that they find easier, more interesting, and possess greater knowledge. Choice also allowed students to demonstrate their autonomy, which they believed, influenced their motivation and writing quality/grades. While the university students in this study generally preferred choice, a majority of them identified benefits of not choosing, including opportunities to improve writing tenacity, enhance their writing skills, and achieve new perspectives.
References
Aitken, A. A. (in press). More motivating than cherry pie? The Writer(s) Within Community model of writing is a motivational theory too. In X. Liu, M. Hebert, & R. Alves (Eds.), The hitchhiker’s guide to writing research: A festschrift for Steve Graham. Springer.
Aitken, A. A., Graham, S., & McNeish, D. (2022). The effects of choice vs preference on writing and the mediating role of perceived competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(8), 1844-1865. doi:10.1037/edu0000765
Barry, A. L., Nielsen, D. C., Glasnapp, D. R., Poggio, J. P., & Sundbye, N. (1997). Large scale performance assessment in writing: Effects of student and teacher choice variables. Contemporary Education, 69(1), 20-26.
Bonzo, J. D. (2008). Observing fluency and complexity in intermediate language writing. Foreign Language Annals (41)4, 722-735. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03327.x
Carroll, S., & Feng, J. (Spring, 2010). Writer’s Workshop vs. Writing Prompts: The effect on first graders’ writing ability and attitude towards writing. Paper presented at the 2010 Annual Conference of Georgia Educational Research Association, Savannah, GA. Paper retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED533063.pdf
Cleary, L. M. (1991). Affect and cognition in the writing processes of eleventh graders: A study of concentration and motivation. Written Communication, 8(4), 473-508. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0741088391008004003
College Board. (2017). Report on college and career readiness 2017. Retrieved from http://research.collegeboard.org/programs/sat/data/cb-seniors-2017.
Cooper, C. (1997). Holistic evaluation of writing. In C. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Evaluating writing (pp. 3–31). National Council of Teachers of English.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
Cordova, D., & Lepper, M. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.715
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
Deci, E. L. (1980). The psychology of self- determination. Heath.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024–1037. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuit: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 277–268. https://doi.org/ 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Edwards, J. M., & Juliebo, M. F. (1989). The effect of topic choice on narrative writing: Grades 1-3. English Quarterly, 21(4), 247-257.
Erwin, E. K. (2002). Teacher/student decision-making over writing in two urban elementary schools (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. (3079114)
Ferretti, R. P., & Fan, Y. (2016). Argumentative writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 288–300). Guilford Publications.
Fischer, C., Malycha, C. P., & Schafmann, E. (2019). The influence of intrinsic motivation and synergistic extrinsic motivators on creativity and innovation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 137-152. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00137
Fishbach, A., & Woolley, K. (2022). The structure of intrinsic motivation. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 9, 339-363.
Flowerday, T., & Schraw, G. (2000). Teacher beliefs about instructional choice: A phenomenological study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 634–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.634
Flowerday, T., & Schraw, G. (2003). Effect of choice on cognitive and affective engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 96, 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00220670309598810
Flowerday, T., Schraw, G., & Stevens, J. (2004). The role of choice and interest in reader engagement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72, 93–114. https://doi.org/ 10.3200/JEXE.72.2.93-114
Flowerday, T., & Shell, D. F. (2015). Disentangling the effects of interest and choice on learning, engagement, and attitude. Learning and Individual Differences, 40, 134-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.05.003 1041-6080/
Gabrielson, S., Gordon, B., & Engelhard Jr, G. (1995). The effects of task choice on the quality of writing obtained in a statewide assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 8(4), 273-290. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0804_1
Graham, S. (2018). A revised writer (s)-within-community model of writing. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406
Graham, S. (2006). Writing. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 457–478). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (2012). Motivation: Past, present, future. In K. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, (Vol. 1, pp. 367–397) Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13273-013
Hall, N., & Webb, D. (2014). Instructors’ support of student autonomy in an introductory physics course. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 10(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020116
Hayes, J. R. (2012). Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 369-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451260
Hayes, J. & Flowers, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Howard, J. L., Bureau, J., Guay, F., Chong, J. X. Y., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1300–1323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789
Intersegmental Committee of the Academic Senates. (2002). Academic literacy: A statement of competencies of students entering California’s public colleges and universities. Retrieved from http://senate.universityofcalifornia.edu/reports/acadlit.pdf.
Katz, I., & Assor, A. (2007). When choice motivates and when it does not. Educational Psychology Review 19, 429. https://doi-org.libproxy.unl.edu/10.1007/s10648-006-9027-y
Kellogg, R. (1986). Designing idea processors for document composition. Behavior Research, Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 18, 118–128. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201010
Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.1
Kim, B., & Kim, H. (2016). Korean college EFL learners' task motivation in written language production. International Education Studies, 9(2), 42-50. https://doi.org/ 10.5539/ies.v9n2p42
Klein, P. D., Arcon, D., & Baker, S. (2016). Writing to learn. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research, (2nd ed., pp. 243–256). Guilford Publications.
Kuhn, D., & Crowell, A. (2011). Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking. Psychological Science, 22(4), 545–552. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0956797611402512
Lane, K., Royer, D., Messenger, M., Common, E., Ennis, R., & Swogger, E. (2015). Empowering teachers with low-intensity strategies to support academic engagement: Implementation and effects of instructional choice for elementary students in inclusive settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 38(4), 473-504. https://doi.org/ 10.1353/etc.2015.0013
Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage Publications.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A method sourcebook. Sage.
Myers, V. G. (2002). A comparison of descriptive writing of first graders using free choice journaling versus topical journaling. (Master’s thesis). Available from ERIC. (62227707; ED471384).
National Assessment Governing Board. (2016). Writing framework for the 2017 National Assessment of Educational Progress (ED–05–R–0022). U. S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C. Retrieved on July 3, 2017 at https://www.nagb.org/content/nagb /assets/documents/publications/frameworks/writing/2017-writing-framework.pdf
National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). The Nation’s Report Card: Writing 2011 (No. NCES 2012-470). Washington, DC: Institute for Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Neely, M. E. (2014). Epistemological and writing beliefs in a first-year college writing course: Exploring shifts across a semester and relationships with argument quality. Journal of Writing Research, 6(2), 141-169. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2014.06.02.3
Ng, J. Y., Ntoumanis, N., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Duda, J. L., & Williams, G. C. (2012). Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 325-340.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612447309
Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318
Papaioannou, A., Bebetsos, E., Theodorakis, Y., Christodoulidis, T., & Kouli, O. (2006). Causal relationships of sport and exercise involvement with goal orientations, perceived competence and intrinsic motivation in physical education: A longitudinal study. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(4), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410400022060
Patall, E. A. (2012). The motivational complexity of choosing: A review of theory and research. In R. Ryan (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation (pp. 249-279). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0015.
Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 270–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742916688655
Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Wynn, S. R. (2010). The effectiveness and relative importance of providing choices in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 896–915. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019545
Penny, J., Johnson, R. L., & Gordon, B. (2000). The effect of rating augmentation on inter-rater reliability: An empirical study of a holistic rubric. Assessing Writing, 7(2), 143-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1075-2935(00)00012-X
Royer, D. J., Lane, K. L., Cantwell, E. D., & Messenger, M. L. (2017). A systematic review of the evidence base for instructional choice in K–12 settings. Behavioral Disorders, 42(3), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742916688655
Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Reisetter, M. F. (1998). The role of choice in reader engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 705–714.
Singleton, R. A., & Straits, B. C. (2005). Approaches to social research, 4th ed. Oxford University Press.
Snibbe, A., & Markus, H. R. (2005). You can’t always get what you want: Educational attainment, agency, and choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 703–720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.703
Tafarodi, R. W., Mehranvar, S., Panton, R. L., & Milne, A. B. (2002). Putting oneself in the task: Choice, personalization, and confidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(5), 648-658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202288009
Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. John Wiley & Sons.
van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Henkemans, F. S., Verheij, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2014). Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5
Vaughn, B. J., & Horner, R. H. (1997). Identifying instructional tasks that occasion problem behaviors and assessing the effects of student versus teacher choice among these tasks. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30(2), 299–312.
https://doi.org/ 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-299
White, E. M. (1985). Teaching and assessing writing. Jossey-Bass.
Wilde, M., Basten, M., Großmann, N., Haunhorst, D., Desch, I., Strüber, M., & Randler, C. (2018). The (non-) benefit of choosing: If you get what you want it is not important that you chose it. Motivation and Emotion, 42(3), 348-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9675-5
Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 301-311. https://doi.org/301.10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.301
Williamson, M. M. (1993). Introduction to holistic scoring: The social, historical and theoretical context for writing assessment. In M. M. Williamson & B. A. Huot (Eds.), Validating holistic scoring for writing assessment: Theoretical and empirical foundations. (2nd ed., pp. 1–43). Hampton Press.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Angelique Aitken, Steve Graham
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
