Participatory roles adopted by elementary students when writing collaboratively in environmental and social studies classrooms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2023.15.01.04Keywords:
collaborative writing, environmental and social studies, participatory roles, elementary studentsAbstract
Much attention has been paid to the complexity underlying writing, but the versatile roles that collaborative writing can encourage in elementary students remain scarcely understood. In this exploratory study, we developed a framework for observing the participatory roles that elementary students spontaneously adopt as they engage in collaborative writing in environmental and social studies classrooms. To concretize the applicability of the framework, we illustrate how five students shift between the roles across task types. We identified 18 participatory roles and allocated them into six categories: content-, literacy-, performance-, process-focused, expressive, and off-task roles. While these generally align with previous research on participatory roles, literacy-focused and expressive role categories emerged as new data-driven findings. The concrete examples provided for illustrating how these roles are reflected when students engage in collaborative writing deepen the understanding of the variety and flexibility in roles adopted across the students and task types. We expect the framework to be beneficial for both teachers and researchers, to observe how flexibly students adopt roles from different categories when writing collaboratively. This can provide insights into designing instruction and selecting task types to effectively promote flexible and meaningful participation among all students when writing collaboratively in subject-area classrooms.
References
Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
Calzada, A., & García Mayo, M.P. (2021). Child learners’ reflections about EFL grammar in a collaborative writing task: When form is not at odds with communication. Language Awareness, 30(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2020.1751178
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal,4(3), 164–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044
Cutler, L., & Graham, S. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 907–919. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012656
Daiute, C., & Dalton, B. (1993). Collaboration between children learning to write: Can novices be masters? Cognition and Instruction, 10(4), 281–333. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3233656
Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00005-6
Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_5
FNBE. (2016). National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education. Accessed via https://www.ellibs.com/book/9789521362590/national-core-curriculum-for-basic-education-2014
Fung, J.M. (2010). Collaborative writing features. RELC Journal, 41(1),18–30.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688210362610
Gilbert, J., & Graham, S. (2010). Teaching writing to elementary students in grades 4-6: A national survey. The Elementary School Journal, 110, 494–518.
https://doi.org/10.1086/651193
Graham, S. (2019). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 277–303. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821125
Graham, S., Kiuhara, S. A., & MacKay, M. (2020). The effects of writing on learning in science, social studies, and mathematics: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 179–226. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320914744
Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., DeCoster, J., Mashburn, A. J., Jones, S. M., Brown, J. L., Cappella, E., Atkins, M., Rivers, S. E., Brackett, M. A., & Hamagami, A. (2013). Teaching through interactions: Testing a developmental framework of teacher effectiveness in over 4,000 classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 113(4), 461–487.
https://doi.org/10.1086/669616
Hayes, J.R. (2011). Kinds of knowledge-telling: Modeling early writing development. Journal of Writing Research, 3(2), 73–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2011.03.02.1
Heinimäki, O-P., Salo, A-E., & Vauras, M. (2019). Luonnontieteiden yhteisöllisessä tietokoneavusteisessa oppimisessa omaksuttujen funktionaalisten osallistumisen roolien luokittelun kehittely [Development of a classification for functional participatory roles enacted during computer supported collaborative science learning]. Psykologia, 54(04), 236–254.
Heinimäki, O.P., Volet, S., Jones, C., Laakkonen, E., & Vauras, M. (2021). Student participatory role profiles in collaborative science learning: Relation of within-group configurations of role profiles and achievement. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30A: 100539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100539
Heinimäki, O.-P., Volet, S., & Vauras, M. (2020). Core and activity-specific functional participatory roles in collaborative science learning. Frontline Learning Research, 8(2), 65–89. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v8i2.469
Herder, A., Berenst, J., De Glopper, K., & Koole, T. (2018). Reflective practices in collaborative writing of primary school students. International Journal of Educational Research, 90, 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.06.004
Jakonen, T. (2015). Handling knowledge: Using classroom materials to construct and interpret information requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 89, 100–112.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.10.001
Kiili, C., Bråten, I., Kullberg, N., & Leppänen, P.H.T. (2020). Investigating elementary school students’ text-based argumentation with multiple online information resources. Computers and Education, 147: 103785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103785
Klein, P.D., & Kirkpatrick, L.C. (2010). Multimodal literacies in science: Currency, coherence, and focus. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9159-4
Kumpulainen, K. (1994). Collaborative writing with computers and children's talk: A cross-cultural study. Computers and Composition, 11, 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/8755-4615(94)90018-3
Langer, J. (1985). Children’s sense of genre. A study of performance in parallel reading and writing tasks. Written Communication, 2(2), 157–187.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088385002002003
Lowry, P. B., Curtis, A., & Lowry, M. R. (2004). Building a taxonomy and nomenclature of collaborative writing to improve interdisciplinary research and practice. Journal of Business Communication, 41(1), 66–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943603259363
Mackenzie, N.M., Scull, J., & Munsie, L. (2013). Analysing writing: the development of a tool for use in the early years of schooling. Issues in Educational Research, 23(3), 375–391. http://www.iier.org.au/iier23/mackenzie.pdf
Maloney, J. (2007). Children’s roles and use of evidence in science: An analysis of decision-making in small groups. British Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 371–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701243636
Nordmark, M. (2014). Digitalt skrivande i gymnasieskolans svenskundervisning: en ämnesdidaktisk studie av skrivprocessen [Digital writing in teaching Swedish at upper secondary school. A subject-specific study of the process of writing]. Örebro: Örebro universitet.
Nykopp, M., Marttunen, M., & Erkens, G. (2019). Coordinating collaborative writing in an online environment. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31, 536–556.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9203-3
Nykopp, M., Marttunen, M., & Laurinen, L. (2014). University students´ knowledge construction during face to face collaborative writing. In P. Klein, P. Boscolo, L. Kirkpatrick, & C. Gelati (Eds.), Writing as a Learning Activity. Studies in Writing (28) (pp. 277–299). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004265011_013
Olinghouse, N. G., Graham, S., & Gillespie, A. (2015). The relationship of discourse and topic knowledge to fifth graders’ writing performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037549
Pentikäinen, J. (2022). Ympäristön monilukutaitoa rakentamassa – Analyysi ympäristöopin harjoituskirjojen kirjoittamisen tehtävistä. [Ecological literacy and writing skills: An analysis on Finnish environmental science exercise book assignments for 4. –6. graders]. In S. Routarinne, P. Heinonen, T. Kärki, A. Roiha, M.-L. Rönkkö & A. Korkeaniemi (Eds.) Ainedidaktiikka ajassa: Laajenevat oppimisympäristöt ja eri-ikäiset oppijat [Subject didactics in time: widening learning environments and learners of different age] (pp. 140–163). Ainedidaktisia tutkimuksia 22. Suomen ainedidaktinen tutkimusseura.
Sabourin, J., Rowe, J., Mott, B. & Lester, J. (2011). When off-task is on-task: The affective role of off-task behavior in narrative-centered learning environments. Artificial Intelligence in Education, 534–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_93
Salo, A-E., Vauras, M., Hiltunen, M., & Kajamies, A. (2022). Long-term intervention of at-risk elementary students' socio-motivational and reading comprehension competencies: Video-based case studies of emotional support in teacher–dyad and dyadic interactions. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 34: 100631.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100631
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3),153–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002
TENK (2009). Ethical principles of research in the humanities and social and behavioural sciences and proposals for ethical review. Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity. https://tenk.fi/en/advice-and-materials
TENK (2012). Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. Guidelines of the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity 2012. https://tenk.fi/en/advice-and-materials
Volet, S., Vauras, M., Salo, A-E., & Khosa, D. (2017). Individual contributions in student-led collaborative learning: Insights from two analytical approaches to explain the quality of group outcome. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 79–92.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.11.006
Välijärvi, J., & Sulkunen, S. (2016). Finnish school in international comparison. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Miracle of Education: The Principles and Practices of Teaching and Learning in Finnish Schools (pp. 3–21). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-776-4_1
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
Wilcox, B., Williams, L., & Reutzel, D.R. (1997). Effects of task roles on participation and productivity in the intermediate grades. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(6), 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1997.10544592
Zhang, M. (2019). Towards a quantitative model of understanding the dynamics of collaboration in collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.04.001
Zhang, M. (2021). Understanding L1 and L2 interaction in collaborative writing: A lexico-grammatical analysis. Language Teaching Research, 25(3) 338–359.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Anne-Elina Salo, Sara Routarinne, Riitta Juvonen, Arja Kaasinen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
