Pauses during a writing process in two typologically different languages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2025.16.03.03Keywords:
pauses, writing process, Finnish, Swedish, language proficiencyAbstract
This study investigates how pausing behaviour within a writing session is associated with the writer's language proficiency, focusing on Finnish and Swedish as both first language (L1) and learner language (L2). The data were collected through keyboard logging software and evaluated using CEFR-based assessments of the resulting texts. The relationship was analysed using ordinal mixed-effects logistic regression modelling, where proficiency is modelled as a function of various variables related to pausing behaviour. The results show that the L2 writing process reflects the writer's proficiency. However, there is a significant difference between L2 writers of Swedish and L2 writers of Finnish compared to L1 writers. The advanced L2 writers of Swedish behave similarly to the L1 Swedish writers. In contrast, even the most advanced L2 writers of Finnish have pause lengths and linguistic contexts that are more similar to the less advanced L2 writers than the L1 writers. In addition, the pauses between words do not indicate any clear proficiency-related patterning, leaving only within-word pauses as a robust indicator of proficiency, especially in Swedish. Unlike most writing process research, this study's parallel design allows for contrasting two typologically diverging languages while controlling for other contextual variables. Future studies could explore the grammatical nature of pause locations across the analysed languages.
References
Alamargot, D., Dansac, C., Chesnet, D., & Fayol, M. (2007). Parallel processing before and after pauses: A combined analysis of graphomotor and eye movements during procedural text production. In M. Torrance, L. Van Waes, & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and cognition: Research and applications (pp. 13–29). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Alanen, R., Huhta, A., & Tarnanen, M. (2010). Designing and assessing L2 writing tasks across CEFR proficiency levels. In I. Barting, M. Martin & I. Vedder (Eds.), Communicative proficiency and linguistic development: intersections between SLA and language testing research. EUROSLA MONOGRAPHS SERIES. (pp. 21–56). European Second Language Association.
Barkaoui, K. (2016). What and When Second-Language Learners Revise When Responding to Timed Writing Tasks on the Computer: The Roles of Task Type, Second Language Proficiency, and Keyboarding Skills. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 229–400.
Barkaoui, K. (2019). What can L2 writers’ pausing behavior tell us about their L2 writing processes? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 529–554. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311900010X
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3). 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Erlbaum.
Chenoweth, N., & Hayes, J. R. (2001). Fluency in writing: Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18, 80–98.
Chenu, F., Pellegrino, F., Jisa, H., & Fayol, M. (2014). Interword and intraword pause threshold in the writing of texts by children and adolescents: A methodological approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(182), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00182
Christensen, R. H. B. (2022). ordinal—Regression Models for Ordinal Data.
Chukharev-Hudilainen, E., Saricaoglu, A., Torrance, M., & Feng, H-H. (2019). Combined deployable keystroke logging and eye-tracking for investigating L2 writing fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(3), 583–604. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311900007X
Cintrón-Valentín, M. C., & Ellis, N. C. (2016). Salience in Second Language Acquisition: Physical Form, Learner Attention, and Instructional Focus. Frontiers in Psychology 7. 1284. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01284.
Cislaru, G., & Olive, T. (2018). Le processus de textualisation: analyse des unités linguistiques de performance écrite. De Boeck.
Council of Europe (Ed.), (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages: learning, teaching, assessment – companion volume. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. http://www.coe.int/lang-cefr.
Damian, M. F., & Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H. (2009). Advance planning of form properties in the written production of single and multiple words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(4), 555–579. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/01690960802346500
Dietrich, R., Klein, W., & Noyau, C. (1995). The Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language. John Benjamins.
Durrant, P. (2013). Formulaicity in an agglutinating language: the case of Turkish. – Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 9(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2013-0009
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1980). A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600
Gánem-Gutiérrez, A., & Gilmore, A. (2018). Tracking the real-time evolution of a writing event: Second language writers at different proficiency levels. Language Learning, 68(2), 469–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12280
Guo, H., Deane, P. D., van Rijn, P. W., Zhang, M., & Bennett, R. E. (2018). Modelling Basic Writing Processes from Keystroke Logs. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55(2), 194–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12172
Gries, S. Th. (2021). Statistics for Linguistics with R. 3rd edition. De Gruyter Mouton.
Kellogg, R.T. (1996). The model of Working Memory in Writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.) The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences and Applications (pp. 57–72). Routledge.
Kellogg, R.T., Whiteford, A.P., Turner, C.E., Cahill, M., & Mertens, A. (2013). Working Memory in Written Composition: An Evaluation of the 1996 Model. Journal of Writing Research, 5(2), 159–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2013.05.02.1
Kowal, I. (2014). Fluency in Second Language Writing: A Developmental Perspective. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 131, 229–246. https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.14.013.2321
Leblay, C., & Caporossi, G. (2015). A graph theory approach to online writing data visualization. In G. Cislaru (Ed.), Writing(s) at the Crossroads: The Process-Product Interface (pp. 171–181). John Benjamin. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.194.09leb
Leijten, M., Van Waes, L., Schrijver, I., Bernolet, S., & Vangehuchten, L. (2019). Mapping master´s students´ use of external sources in source-based writing in L1 and L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(3), 555–582. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000251
Lindgren, E., Knospe, Y., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2019). Researching Writing with Observational Logging Tools from 2006 to the Present. In E. Lindgren & K. P. H. Sullivan (Eds.), Researching Writing with Observational Logging Tools from 2006 to the Present (pp. 1–29). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392526_002
Lüdecke, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Patil, I., Waggoner, P., & Makowski, D. (2021). performance: An R Package for Assessment, Comparison and Testing of Statistical Models. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(60), 3139. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03139.
Matsuhashi, A. (1981). Pausing and planning: the tempo of written discourse production. Research in the Teaching of English, 15(2), 113–134. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40170920
Matsuhashi, A. (1982). Explorations in the real-time production of written discourse. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: the language, process, and structure of written discourse. (pp. 269–290). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004454118_015
Matsuhashi, A. (1987). Writing in real time: modelling production processes. Ablex.
Michel, M., Révész, A., Lu, X., Kourtali, N-E., Lee, M., & Borges, L. (2020). Investigating L2 writing processes across independent and integrated tasks: A mixed-methods study. Second Language Research, 36(3), 307–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320915501
Mohsen, M. A. (2021). L1 versus L2 writing processes: What insight can we obtain from a keystroke logging program? Language Teaching Research, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211041292
Mohsen, M.A., & Qassem, M. (2020). Analyses of L2 learners’ text writing strategy: Process-oriented perspective. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 49, 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09693-9
Mutta, M. (2017) Pausal Behavior in the Writing Processes of Foreign and Native Language Writers: The Importance of Defining the Individual Pause Length. In S. Plane, C. Bazerman, F. Rondelli, C. Donahue, A. N. Applebee, C. Boré, P. Carlino, M. M. Larruy, P. Rogers & D. R. Russell (Eds.), Research on Writing: Multiple Perspectives. (pp. 511– 529). The WAC Clearinghouse https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/wrab2014/chapter28.pdf
R Core Team. 2022. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
Révész, A., Kourtali, N., & Mazgutova, D. (2017). Effects of task complexity on L2 writing behaviors and linguistic complexity. Language Learning, 67(1), 208–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12205
Révész, A., Michel, M., & Lee, M. (2019). Exploring second language writers’ pausing and revision behaviors a mixed-methods study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(3), 605–631. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311900024X
Révész, A., Michel, M., Lu, X., Kourtali, N., Lee, M., & Borges, L. (2022). The relationship of proficiency to speed fluency, pausing, and eye-gaze behaviours in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100927.
Ringbom, H. 2007. Cross-linguistic Similarity in Foreign Language Learning. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599361.
Roca de Larios, J., Manchón, R., Murphy, L., & Marín, J. (2008). The foreign language writer’s strategic behaviour in the allocation of time to writing processes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(1), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.08.005
Sasaki, M. (2000). Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 259–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00028-X
Sasaki, M. (2002). Building an empirically-based model of EFL learners’ writing processes. In G. Rijlaarsdam, S. Ransdell & M. Barbier (Eds.), Studies in writing, volume 11: New directions for research in L2 writing (pp. 49–80). Amsterdam, NL: Kluwer.
Sasaki, M. (2004). A multiple-data analysis of the 3.5-year development of EFL student writers. Language Learning, 54(3), 525–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00264.x
Sasaki, M., Mizumoto, A., & Murakami, A. (2018). Developmental trajectories in L2 writing strategy use: A self-regulation perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 292–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12469
Schilperoord, J. (1996) The distribution of pause time in written text production. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Current research in writing: theories, models and methodology. (pp. 21–35). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004458598_004
Schoonen, R., Snellings, P., Stevenson, M., & van Gelderen, A. (2009). Towards a blueprint of the foreign language writer: The linguistic and cognitive demands of foreign language writing. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 77–101). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691859-007
Shen, C., & Chen, N. (2021). Profiling the pausing behaviour of EFL learners in real-time computer-aided writing: a multi-method case study. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 6(15), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-021-00118-1
Spelman Miller, K. (2000). Academic writers on-line: Investigating pausing in the production of text. Language Teaching Research, 4(2), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400203
Van Waes, L., & Leijten, M. (2015). Fluency in Writing: A Multidimensional Perspective on Writing Fluency Applied to L1 and L2. Computers and Composition 38(Part A), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.012
Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., Roeser, J. Olive, T., & Grabowski, J. (2021). Measuring and assessing typing skills in writing research. Journal of Writing Research 13(1), 107–153. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2021.13.01.04
Wengelin, Å. (2006). Examining pauses in writing: Theory, methods and empirical data. Computer Key-Stroke Logging and Writing: Methods and Applications 18, 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1163/9780080460932_008
Whittingham, M. J., Stephens, P. A., Bradbury, R. B., & Freckleton, R. P. (2006). Why Do We Still Use Stepwise Modelling in Ecology and Behaviour? The Journal of animal ecology, 75(5). 1182–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01141.x.
Winter, B., & Grice, M. (2021). Independence and generalizability in linguistics. Linguistics, 59(5). 1251–1277. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2019-0049.
Xu, C. (2018). Understanding online revisions in L2 writing: A computer keystroke-log perspective. System, 78, 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.08.007
Xu, C., & Xia, J. (2019). Scaffolding process knowledge in L2 writing development: Insights from computer keystroke log and process graph. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(4), 583–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1632901
Yiğitoğlu, N., & Reichelt, M. (2019). Introduction: L2 Writing in Non-English Languages: Toward a Fuller Understanding of L2 Writing. In N. Yiğitoğlu & M. Reichelt (Eds.), L2 Writing Beyond English (pp. xiii–xix). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788923132-003
Zhang, M., Bennett, E.R., Deane, P., & van Rijn, P. (2019). Are there gender differences in how students write their essays? An analysis of writing processes. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 38(2), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12249
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ilmari Ivaska, Outi Toropainen, Sinikka Lahtinen
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccae2/ccae256abab744595c08a9003d81d73d146f92f1" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.