Teaching models of disciplinary argumentation in middle school social studies: A framework for supporting writing development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2021.13.02.04Keywords:
disciplinary literacy, writing instruction, teacher quality, composition, strategy instructionAbstract
Modeling, by demonstrating and explaining the cognitive processes involved in writing, has been shown to support writing development. Less often have specific disciplinary aspects of teaching with models been investigated. We draw on research in English Language Arts and apply it in social studies inquiry contexts to propose a framework for teaching models of thinking and writing that offers teachers and researchers new perspectives on the discipline-specific work of modeling. This framework accounts for three modes of instruction – use of models (a tool or a text), demonstrating and explaining, and co-constructing model texts with students – and describes eleven instructional practices that support instruction across these modes. We analyze data from three years of social studies instruction to show how two teachers enact these practices across the three modes to highlight the disciplinary thinking and processes that support writing social studies arguments with sources, highlighting the ways students can actively participate in teaching writing with models. In addition, we consider the role of the curriculum in this work. We show how writing instruction can address disciplinary ways of thinking in social studies and illustrate the potential of the framework for guiding researchers’ and practitioners’ work on writing instruction across disciplinary contexts.
References
Alston, C. L. (2012). Examining instructional practices, intellectual challenge, and supports for African American student writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 47(2), 112–144.
Alston, C. L., & Danielson, K. A. (2020). Enacting thinking: Supporting teacher candidates in modeling writing strategies. Literacy Research and Instruction.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2020.1822475
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. In The Psychology of Written Composition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812310
Braaksma, M. A. H., Rijlaarsdam, G., Van Den Bergh, H., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2004). Observational learning and its effects on the orchestration of writing processes. Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690Xci2201_1
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
Brown, A., & Palinscar, A. (1986). Guided cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition: Vol. Tech. Rep. (Issue Report). University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x018001032
Cohen, J. (2015). Challenges in identifying high-leverage practices. Teachers College Record. 117(7), 1-41.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 6(11), 38–46.
De La Paz, S., Monte-Sano, C., Felton, M., Croninger, R., Jackson, C., & Piantedosi, K. W. (2017). A historical writing apprenticeship for adolescents: Integrating disciplinary learning with cognitive strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 31-52.
https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.147
Englert, C. S., Mariage, T. V, & Dunsmore, K. (2006). Tenets of sociocultural theory in writing instruction research. In C. A. MacArthur S. Graham, and J. Fitzgerald (Ed.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 208–221). The Guilford Pres.
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2016). Systems for teaching complex texts: A proof-of-concept investigation. Reading Teacher, 69(4), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1409
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.
Graham, S., Gillespie, A., & McKeown, D. (2013). Writing: Importance, development, and instruction. Reading and Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9395-2
Alston, C. L. (2012). Examining instructional practices, intellectual challenge, and supports for African American student writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 47(2), 112–144.
Alston, C. L., & Danielson, K. A. (2020). Enacting thinking: Supporting teacher candidates in modeling writing strategies. Literacy Research and Instruction.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2020.1822475
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. In The Psychology of Written Composition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812310
Braaksma, M. A. H., Rijlaarsdam, G., Van Den Bergh, H., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2004). Observational learning and its effects on the orchestration of writing processes. Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690Xci2201_1
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
Brown, A., & Palinscar, A. (1986). Guided cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition: Vol. Tech. Rep. (Issue Report). University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x018001032
Cohen, J. (2015). Challenges in identifying high-leverage practices. Teachers College Record. 117(7), 1-41.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 6(11), 38–46.
De La Paz, S., Monte-Sano, C., Felton, M., Croninger, R., Jackson, C., & Piantedosi, K. W. (2017). A historical writing apprenticeship for adolescents: Integrating disciplinary learning with cognitive strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 31-52.
https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.147
Englert, C. S., Mariage, T. V, & Dunsmore, K. (2006). Tenets of sociocultural theory in writing instruction research. In C. A. MacArthur S. Graham, and J. Fitzgerald (Ed.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 208–221). The Guilford Pres.
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2016). Systems for teaching complex texts: A proof-of-concept investigation. Reading Teacher, 69(4), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1409
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.
Graham, S., Gillespie, A., & McKeown, D. (2013). Writing: Importance, development, and instruction. Reading and Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9395-2
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2018). An examination of the design principles underlying a self-regulated strategy development study. Journal of Writing Research, 10(2), 139–187. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2018.10.02.02
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools: A report from the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Alliance for Excellent Education.
Grossman, P., Cohen, J., & Brown, L. (2014). Understanding instructional quality in English Language Arts: Variations in the relationship between PLATO and value-added by content and context. In T. Kane, K. Kerr, & R. Pianta (Eds.), Designing teacher evaluation systems: New guidance from the measures of effective teaching project (pp. 303–331). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119210856.ch10
Hillocks, G. (2011). Commentary on “Research in secondary English, 1912–2011: Historical continuities and discontinuities in the NCTE imprint.” Research in the Teaching of English, 46(2), 187–192.
John-Steiner & Meehan, T.M., V. P. (2000). Creativity and collaboration in knowledge construction. In C. D. L. & P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Vygotskyian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 31–48). Cambridge University Press.
Kinloch, V. (2018). Necessary disruptions: Examining justice, engagement, and humanizing approaches to teaching and teacher education. In TeachingWorks working paper. University of Michigan.
McGrew, S., Alston, C. L., & Fogo, B. (2018). Modeling as an example of representation. In P. Grossman (Ed.), Teaching Core Practices in Teacher Education (pp. 35–55). Harvard Education Press.
Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1995). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
Monte-Sano, C. (2010). Disciplinary literacy in history: An exploration of the historical nature of adolescents’ writing. Journal of the Learning Sciences.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2010.481014
Monte-Sano, C., & Allen, A. (2019). Historical argument writing: The role of interpretive work, argument type, and classroom instruction. Reading and Writing, 32, 1383–1410 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9891-0
Monte-Sano, C., Hughes, R. E., & Thomson, S. (2019). From form to function: Learning with practitioners to support diverse middle school students' disciplinary reasoning and writing. In B. Rubin, E. Freedman, & J. Kim (Eds.) Design Research in Social Studies Education: Critical Lessons from an Emerging Field (pp.31-57). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429024382-2
Moore, J. (2019). Choice and constraint: Using SFL genre theory to teach primary-grade students to write arguments about literature. Journal of Writing Research, 10(3), 429-464 https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.10.03.02
Paxton, R. J. (2002). The influence of author visibility on high school students solving a historical problem. Cognition and Instruction, 20(2), 197-248.
https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2002_3
Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Drie, J., & Van Boxtel, C. (2008). Historical reasoning: Towards a framework for analyzing students’ reasoning about the past. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 87–110
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9056-1
Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73
Yin, R. K. (2013). Introduction to Case Study research. In International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research (IJMSR) Volume 3, Issue 2, February 2009, PP 42-53 ISSN 2349-0330 (Print) & ISSN 2349-0349 (Online) www.arcjournals.org Impact .
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Chandra L. Alston, Chauncey Monte-Sano, Mary Schleppegrell, Kimberly Harn
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
