Developing students' writing in History: Effects of a teacher-designed domain-specific writing instruction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2021.13.02.01Keywords:
historical reasoning, literacy, writing instruction, writing processes, secondary educationAbstract
Writing in history places high demands on students and is a skill that requires explicit instruction. Therefore, teachers need to be able to teach this in an effective way. In this study, the writing-instruction was designed by a teacher, instead of researchers, as part of a professional development program in the Netherlands. The lessons combined writing and historical reasoning instruction, based on principles of effective writing instruction, including strategy-instruction, modeling, prewriting, and peer-interaction. The effects of these lessons were investigated in a small-scale pilot study, which consisted of a pre-test post-test quasi-experimental design, in which eighty-nine 11th grade students participated (39 in the treatment condition and 50 in the comparison condition). Dependent measures included text quality, writing process measures, students' knowledge of writing and their self-efficacy. Students in the treatment condition wrote longer and higher quality texts, spent more time writing, paused more while writing and their knowledge of writing was higher at post-test than for students in the comparison condition. No effects were found for self-efficacy. Furthermore, significant correlations were found between text quality and writing process measures, but not for knowledge of writing and self-efficacy. Overall, the effectiveness of this teacher-designed intervention seemed satisfactory, as it resulted in greater knowledge of writing and better-quality writing in his history classes.
References
Applebee, A. (1984). Writing and reasoning. Review of Educational Research, 54, 577–596.
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543054004577
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based
writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of
Educational Research, 74, 29-58. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001029
Beaufort, A. (2004). Developmental gains of a history major: A case for building a theory of
disciplinary writing expertise. Research in the Teaching of English, 39(2), pp. 136-185.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/40171658
Borko, H. (2004). Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain,
Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
Bouwer, R. & Koster, M. (2016). Bringing writing research into the classroom. The effectiveness
of Tekster, a newly developed writing program for elementary students. Unpublished
Dissertation, University of Utrecht. https://issuu.com/tekster6/docs/tekster_proefschriftdigi2
Braaksma, M., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2015). Introduction to the special issue on Writing-to-learn
studies. Journal of Writing Research, 7(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2015.07.01.01
Braaksma, M. A. H., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2018). Effects of hypertext writing and
observational learning on content knowledge acquisition, self-efficacy, and text quality:
Two experimental studies exploring aptitude treatment interactions. Journal of Writing
Research, 9(3), 259-300. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2018.09.03.02
Clarke, D. & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947-967.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
Coffin, C. (2006). Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. New York:
Continuum.
De La Paz, S. (2005). Effects of historical reasoning instruction and writing strategy mastery in
culturally and academically diverse middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 97(2), 139-156. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.139
De La Paz, S. & Felton, M. K. (2010). Reading and writing from multiple source documents in
history: Effects of strategy instruction with low to average high school writers.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 174-192.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.03.001
den Elzen, M., Oorschot, F., Visser, A., van der Leeuw, B. & Meestringa, T. (2018). Redeneren
en formuleren bij mens- en maatschappijvakken. [Reasoning and formulating in the social
science subjects]. Enschede, The Netherlands: SLO.
De Oliveira, L. C. (2011). Knowing and writing school history. The language of students’
expository writing and teachers’ expectations. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
VAN DRIE ET AL. DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ WRITING IN HISTORY | 222
Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28,
-128. https://doi.org/10.2307/356095
Expert Group Learning Trajectories (2009). Referentiekader taal en rekenen: De
referentieniveaus. [Reference framework language and arithmetic: The referential levels].
Enschede, The Netherlands: Ministerie van OCW.
Gillespie, A., Graham, S., Kiuhara, S., & Hebert, M. (2014). High school teachers use of writing
to support students' learning: A national survey. Reading and Writing, 27(6), 1043-1072.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9494-8
Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2018a). Evidence-based writing practices: A meta-analysis of existing
meta-analyses. In R. Fidalgo & T. Olive (Series Eds.) & R. Fidalgo, K.R. Harris, & M. Braaksma,
(Vol Eds.), Design principles for teaching effective writing. Studies in Writing Series: Vol.
(pp. 13-38). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004270480_003
Graham, S. & Harris, K. (2018b). An examination of the design principles underlying a selfregulated strategy development study. Journal of Writing Research 10(2). 139-187.
https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2018.10.02.02
Graham, S., Harris, K., MacArthur, C. A., & Schwartz, S. S. (1998). Writing instruction. In B. Y. L.
Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 391–424). San Diego, CA:
Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-762530-0.50017-5
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445-476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
Hajer, M. & Meestringa, T. (2020). Handboek Taalgericht Vakonderwijs. [Handbook Language
Oriented Content Teaching]. Uitgeverij Coutinho.
Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition
and self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Brindle, M. & Sandmel, K. (2009). Metacognition and children's
writing. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds), Handbook of metacognition in
education (pp 131-153). New York, NY: Routledge.
Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C.
M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual
differences, and applications (pp. 1-27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
Publishers.
Hayes, J. R. (2012). Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 369-388.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451260
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W.
Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hillocks, G. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, Ill.:
ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills, National Institute of
Education.
Kellogg, R.T. (2008). Training Writing Skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of
Writing Research, 1(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.1
Klein, P. D., & Kirkpatrick, L. C. (2010). A Framework for Content Area Writing: Mediators and
Moderators. Journal of Writing Research, 2(1), 1-46. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr2010.02.01.1
Koster, M., Bouwer, R., & van den Bergh, H. (2017). Professional development of teachers in
the implementation of a strategy-focused writing intervention program for elementary
students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 1–20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.10.002
Koster, M., Tribushinina, E. , de Jong, P. F., & van den Bergh, H. (2015). Teaching children to
write: A meta-analysis of writing intervention research. Journal of Writing Research, 7(2).
-324. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2015.07.02.2
| JOURNAL OF WRITING RESEARCH
Langer, J. (1992). Speaking of knowing: Conceptions of understanding in academic disciplines.
In A. Herrington, & C. Moran (Eds.), Writing, teaching, and learning in the disciplines (pp.
-85). New York: The Modern Language Association of America.
Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2013). Keystroke logging in writing research: Using Inputlog to
analyze and visualize writing processes. Written Communication 30(3), 358–392.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313491692
McCarthy Young, K., & Leinhardt, G. (1998). Writing from primary document. A way of knowing
in history. Written communication 15(1), 25-68.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088398015001002
McCutchen, D. (1986). Domain knowledge and linguistic knowledge in the development of
writing ability. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(4), 431-444.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(86)90036-7
McCutchen, D. (2011). From novice to expert: Implications of language skills and writing
relevant knowledge for memory during the development of writing skill. Journal of
Writing Research, 3(1), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2011.03.01.3
Moje, E.B. (2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A
call for change. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 52(2), 96-107.
https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1
Monte-Sano, C. (2010). Disciplinary literacy in history: An exploration of the historical nature
of adolescents’ writing. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 539-568.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2010.481014
Monte-Sano, C. & Allen, A. (2019). Historical argument writing: The role of interpretive work,
argument type, and classroom instruction. Reading & Writing, 32, 1383-1410.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9891-0
Mottart, A., van Brabant, P., & van de Ven, P-H. (2009). Schrijven bij diverse schoolvakken. Een
verkenning. [Writing in the disciplines; An exploration] Levende Talen Tijdschrift 10(4), 14-
https://lt-tijdschriften.nl/ojs/index.php/ltt/article/view/181
Nokes, J. D. & De La Paz, S. (2018). Writing and argumentation in history education. In: S.
Metzger & L. Harris (Eds). International Handbook of History Teaching and Learning. pp.
-578. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. http://45.114.134.178:9000/digi/MP03/B1L3-
pdf#page=551
Rijlaarsdam, G., Braaksma, M., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Kieft, M., Broekkamp, H., & van den
Bergh, H. (2005). Psychology and the teaching of writing in 8000 and some words. In P.
Tomlinson, J. Dockrell & P. Winne (Eds.), Pedagogy – Teaching for Learning. British Journal
of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II: Psychological Aspects of Education –
Current Trends, Number 3 (pp. 127-153). Leicester: The British Psychological Society.
Schoonen, R., & de Glopper, K. (1996). Writing performance and knowledge about writing. In
G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, models & methodology in
writing research (pp. 87-107). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Schoonen, R., van Gelderen, A., de Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., & Stevenson,
M. (2003). First language and second language writing: The role of linguistic knowledge,
speed of processing, and metacognitive knowledge. Language learning, 53(1), 165-202.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00213
Shanahan, T. & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: rethinking
content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 40-59.
https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
Sendur, K. A., van Boxtel, C., & van Drie, J. (2021). Undergraduate L2 students’ performance
when evaluating historical sources for reliability. English for Specific Purposes, 61, 17-31.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.08.004
Stoel, G. L., van Drie, J. P., & van Boxtel, C. A. M. (2017). The effects of explicit teaching of
strategies, second-order concepts, and epistemological underpinnings on students’
VAN DRIE ET AL. DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ WRITING IN HISTORY | 224
ability to reason causally in History. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 321-337.
https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000143
van Boxtel, C. & van Drie, J. (2018). Historical Reasoning: Conceptualizations and Educational
Applications. In: S. Metzger & L. Harris (Eds). International Handbook of History Teaching
and Learning. pp. 149-176. New York, Wiley-Blackwell.
http://45.114.134.178:9000/digi/MP03/B1L3-0034.pdf#page=162
Vandermeulen, N. (2020). Synthesis writing in upper-secondary education: From a baseline of
texts and processes to process-oriented feedback. Unpublished Dissertation, University
of Antwerp.
Vandermeulen, N., Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2020). Reporting Writing Process Feedback in
the Classroom: Using Keystroke Logging Data to Reflect on Writing Processes. Journal of
Writing Research, 12(1), 109-140. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.12.01.05
van Drie, J., Braaksma, M, & Van Boxtel, C. (2015). Writing in History: Effects of writing
instruction on historical reasoning and text quality, Journal of Writing Research, 7(1), 123-
https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2015.07.01.06
van Drie, J., Groenendijk, T., Braaksma, M. & Janssen, T. (2016). Genrespecifiek schrijven in
de mens- en maatschappijvakken, Negen lesontwerpen onderzocht [Genre specific
writing in the social sience subjects]. Landelijk Expertisecentrum Mens- en
Maatschappijvakken.
https://www.nro.nl/sites/nro/files/migrate/genrespecifiek_schrijven_vanDrieea_LEMM.pdf
van Drie, J., Janssen, T., & Groenendijk, T. (2017). Improving writing in social studies through
professional development: Effects on teachers’ beliefs, classroom practice and students’
writing. European Journal for Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 273-308.
https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2017-0009
van Drie, J., Janssen, T., & Groenendijk, T. (2018). Effects of writing instruction on adolescents’
knowledge of writing and text quality in History. L1-Educational Studies in Language and
Literature, 18, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2018.18.03.08
van Drie, J., Van Boxtel, C., Jaspers, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2005). Effects of representational
guidance on domain specific reasoning in CSCL. Computers in Human Behavior 21(4),
-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.024
Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., Lindgren, E., & Wengelin, A. (2015). Keystroke logging in writing
research: Analyzing online writing processes. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald
(Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research, pp. 410-426. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., & van Weijen, D. (2009). Keystroke logging in writing research:
Observing writing processes with Inputlog. GFL-German as a foreign language, 2(3), 41-64.
Viera, A. J, & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding Interobserver Agreement: The Kappa Statistic.
Family Medicine, 37(5), 360 – 363.
Wengelin, A. (2006). Examining pauses in writing: Theory, methods and empirical data. In K. H.
Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer keystroke logging and writing: Methods and
applications (pp. 107-130). Oxford: Elsevier
Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of cognitive processes used in the
evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83,
-87. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73
Wright, K.L., Hodges, T. S., Enright, E., & Abbott, J. (2021). The relationship between middle and
high school students' motivation to write, value of writing, writer self-beliefs, and writing
outcomes. Journal of Writing Research 12(3), 601-623. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr2021.12.03.03
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jannet Van Drie, Johan Van Driel, Daphne Van Weijen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
