“Sorry, I don’t good English”: Japanese L2 students’ written peer feedback in the face-to-face and anonymous review modes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2023.15.02.02Keywords:
peer review, written peer feedback, anonymity, mitigation, hedgingAbstract
To verify and extend the previous research claim that L2 students from collectivistic Asian cultures are resistant to criticizing others’ work due to a desire to preserve group cohesion, this study explored whether anonymity helps ameliorate their alleged reluctance to give negative feedback. Nineteen Japanese L2 students reviewed essays in the face-to-face and anonymous modes, and their feedback comments were comparatively analyzed according to the types, levels of negativity, and mitigation strategies implemented. The results showed that Japanese L2 students adopt an extremely polite interpersonal rhetorical stance regardless of the peer review mode. Criticism almost always assumes a mitigated form, and it is not uncommon to employ multiple mitigation strategies or lexical hedges in a single comment. The pragmatic competence with respect to hedging disagreement or requests did not correlate with the language used or the reviewer’s L2 proficiency. These observations suggest that the use of mitigating devices is transferred from learners’ L1 repertoire, indicating that cultural attributes might not be a major factor influencing Asian students’ reluctance to provide negative feedback in peer interactions.
References
Adachi, T. (2002). Meirei, irai no modariti [The modality of commands and requests]. In K. Miyazaki, T. Adachi, H. Noda, & S. Takanashi (Eds.), Modariti (Shin nihongo bunpou sensho 4) [Modality (New selected publications on the Japanese language 4)] (pp. 42–77). Kuroshio Shuppan.
Aijmer, K. (2002). English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. John Benjamins.
Amaghlobeli, N. (2012). Linguistic features of typographic emoticons in SMS discourse. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(2), 348–354. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.2.348-354
Barotto, A. (2018). The hedging function of exemplification: Evidence from Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 123, 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.09.007
Beebe, L. M., & Takahashi, T. (1989). Do you have a bag?: Social status and patterned variation in second language acquisition. In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston, D., & L. Selinker (Eds.), Variation in second language acquisition: Discourse and pragmatics (pp. 103–128). Multilingual Matters.
Berg, E. C. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 215–241.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80115-5
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Bui, G., & Kong, A. (2019). Metacognitive instruction for peer review interaction in L2 writing. Journal of Writing Research, 11(2), 357–392. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.05
Carson, J. G., & Nelson, G. L. (1996). Chinese students’ perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 1–19.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90012-0
Coomber, M., & Silver, R. (2010). The effect of anonymity in peer review. In A. M. Stoke (Ed.), JALT2009 conference proceedings (pp. 621–631). JALT.
Crinon, J. (2012). The dynamics of writing and peer review at primary school. Journal of Writing Research, 4(2), 121–154. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2012.04.02.2
Davies, P. (2006). Peer assessment: Judging the quality of students’ work by comments rather than marks. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(1), 69–82.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290500467566
Derham, C., Balloo, K., & Winstone, N. (2022). The focus, function and framing of feedback information: Linguistic and content analysis of in-text feedback comments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(6), 896–909.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1969335
Golato, A., & Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2006). Negotiation of face in web chats. Multilingua, 25(3), 293–321. https://doi.org/10.1515/MULTI.2006.017
Guerrero, M. C. M. de, & Villamil, O. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00052
Hansen, J. G., & Liu, J. (2005). Guiding principles for effective peer response. ELT Journal, 59(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci004
Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400103
Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics, 17(4), 433–454. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.4.433
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Longman.
Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 185–212.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00038-8
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2019). Interpersonality and teacher-written feedback. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2nd ed., pp. 165–183). Cambridge University Press.
Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D. (2014). Describing speech acts: Linking research and pedagogy. In N. Ishihara & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet (pp. 56–74). Routledge.
Itakura, H. (2013). Hedging praise in English and Japanese book reviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 45(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.003
Johnson, D. M. (1992). Compliments and politeness in peer-review texts. Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/13.1.51
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell.
Kim, S. (2019). Japanese student writers’ perspectives on anonymous peer review. ELT Journal, 73(3), 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy061
Kim, S. (2023). ‘Who expresses an honest opinion as it stands in Japan?’: Cultural issues and Japanese L2 students’ experiences of face-to-face and anonymous peer review. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(2), 322–335.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2073983
Kim, S., & Chang, C.-H. (2022). Japanese L2 learners’ translanguaging practice in written peer feedback. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(4), 1363–1376.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1760201
Kim, S., & Lan, Y. (2021). L2 writers’ perspectives on face-to-face and anonymous peer review: Voices from China. Porta Linguarum, 35, 149–164.
https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.v0i35.13887
Kreutel, K. (2007). “I’m not agree with you.” ESL learners’ expressions of disagreement. TESL-EJ, 11(3), 1–35.
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. Harper & Row.
Lee, N. S. (2010). Written peer feedback by EFL students: Praise, criticism and suggestion. Komaba Journal of English Education, 1, 129–139.
http://park.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/eigo/KJEE/001/129-139.pdf
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30–43.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002
Maíz-Arévalo, C. (2014). “I’m sorry I don’t agree with you”: Can we teach nonnative students pragmatic competence when expressing disagreement? Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 433–453. https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.27.2.09mai
Mangelsdorf, K. (1992). Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: What do the students think? ELT Journal, 46(3), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/46.3.274
Matsumura, S. (2003). Modelling the relationships among interlanguage pragmatic development, L2 proficiency, and exposure to L2. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 465–491.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.465
Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.1.1
Nelson, G. L., & Carson, J. G. (1998). ESL students’ perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(2), 113–131.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90010-8
Nguyen, T. T. M. (2008). Modifying L2 criticisms: How learners do it? Journal of Pragmatics, 40(4), 768–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.008
Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
Niyekawa, A. M. (1991). Minimum essential politeness: A guide to the Japanese honorific language. Kodansha International.
Patchan, M. M., Charney, D., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). A validation study of students’ end comments: Comparing comments by students, a writing instructor, and a content instructor. Journal of Writing Research, 1(2), 124–152. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2009.01.02.2
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/ dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge University Press.
Porte, G. (2012). Introduction. In G. Porte (Ed.), Replication research in applied linguistics (pp. 1–18). Cambridge University Press.
Preisler, B. (1986). Linguistic sex roles in conversation. De Gruyter Mouton.
Pringle, P. (n.d.). Clearing the air—The power of apology in Japan. Japan Intercultural Consulting. https://japanintercultural.com/free-resources/articles/clearing-the-air-the-power-of-apology-in-japan
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.
Sandstrom, K. H. (2021). Building genre knowledge through peer review: L2 doctoral students’ provision of feedback in the natural sciences. Journal of Writing Research, 13(2), 257–283.
https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2021.13.02.03
Smagorinsky, P. (2008). The method section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social science research reports. Written Communication, 25(3), 389–411.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088308317815
Taguchi, N. (2012). Context, individual differences and pragmatic competence. Multilingual Matters.
Vandergriff, I. (2014). A pragmatic investigation of emoticon use in nonnative/native speaker text chat. Language@Internet, 11.
https://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2014/vandergriff/
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Yallop, R., Taremaa, P., & Leijen, D. (2021). The affect and effect of asynchronous written feedback comments on the peer feedback process: An ethnographic case-study approach within one L2 English doctorate writing group. Journal of Writing Research, 12(3), 531–600.
https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2021.12.03.02
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2014). An analysis of Chinese EFL students’ use of first and second language in peer feedback of L2 writing. System, 47, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.08.007
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sugene Kim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
