The dimensionality of writing and reading fluency and its impact on comprehension and composition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2022.14.02.02Keywords:
writing fluency, reading fluency, writing competence, reading competence, structural equation modelAbstract
Based on the theory of automated and controlled processing of fluency and Levelt's theory of speech production, writing fluency and reading fluency were each defined as two-dimensional constructs. Writing fluency is composed of automatised transcription and attention-demanding translation, while reading fluency is composed of automatised reading speed and controlled prosodic reading. The study investigates how these constructs can be measured, how they interact and what influence they have on higher hierarchical processes of writing and reading. For this purpose, different measurement instruments were developed and existing instruments were used. Using these instruments and different variables on cognitive resources such as memory and motor skills, we applied a structural equation model to the data of a total of 145 fourth, sixth and ninth graders. The model showed a good fit to the data. Furthermore, the instruments showed high factor loadings on the respective latent factors. With the use of the model, a medium correlation was found between the two factors of writing fluency as well as between the two factors of reading fluency. There was also a strong influence of writing fluency and reading fluency on higher order skills. The understanding of these relationships is particularly important for the creation of training programs for writing and reading fluency.
References
Abbot, R. D. & Berninger, V. W. (1993). Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary and intermediate grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 478-508.
Abbot, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (1993). Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary and intermediate grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 478–508.
Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001a). Through the models of writing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001b). Translating process. In D. Alamargot, & L. Chanquoy (Eds.), Studies in writing: vol 9. Through the models of writing, p. 65–96. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Alamargot, D., Dansac, C., Chesnet, D., & Fayol, M. (2007). Parallel processing before and after pauses: A combined analysis of graphomotor and eye movements during procedural text production. In M. Torrance, L. van Waes, & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and Cognition: Research and Applications, pp. 13–29. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Alves, R., & Limpo, T. (2015). Progress in Written Language Bursts, Pauses, Transcription, and Written Composition across Schooling. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19, 374–391. dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2015.1059838
Anderson, J. R (1990). Cognitive psychology and its implications (3rd ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Anderson, J. R. (2007). How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Artelt, C., Stanat, P., Schneider W. & Schiefele, U. (2001). Lesekompetenz: Testkonzeption und Ergebnisse. In Deutsches PISA‐Konsortium (Ed.), PISA 2000. Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich (p. 69–137). Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
Baaijen, V. M., Galbraith, D., & de Glopper, K. (2012). Keystroke analysis: Reflections on procedures and measures. Written Communication, 29 (3), 246–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451108
Baumert, J., Klieme, E., Neubrand, M., Prenzel, M., Schiefele, U., Schneider, W., Stanat, P., Tillmann, K.J. & Weiß, M. (Deutsches PISA-Konsortium) (Eds.) (2001). PISA 2000. Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich. Opladen: Leske & Budrich. 10.1007/978-3-322-83412-6.
Becker-Mrotzek, M. & Böttcher, I. (2006). Schreibkompetenz entwickeln und beurteilen. Berlin: Cornelsen Scriptor.
Becker-Mrotzek, M., Grabowski, J., Jost, J., Knopp, M. & Linnemann, M. (2014). Adressatenorientierung und Kohärenzherstellung im Text. Zum Zusammenhang kognitiver und schriftlich realisierter Teilkomponenten von Schreibkompetenz. Didaktik Deutsch, 37, 21–43.
Berninger, V. W. (1999). Coordinating transcription and text generation in working memory during composing: Automatic and constructive processes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 99–112. doi: 10.2307/1511269
Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Graham, S., & Richards, T. (2002). Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 39–56.
Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2010). Listening comprehension, oral expression, reading comprehension, and written expression: Related yet unique language systems in grades 1, 3, 5, and 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 635–651. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00193199.
Berninger, V., Cartwright, A., Yates, C., Swanson, H. L., & Abbott, R. (1994). Developmental skills related to writing and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades: Shared and unique variance. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 161–196.
Berninger, V., Fuller, F., & Whitaker, D. (1996). A process approach to writing development across the life span. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 193-218.
Berninger, V. W., & Swanson, H. L. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flower’s model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. In E. C. Butterfield, & J. Carlson (Eds.), Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing (pp. 57–81) London: JAI Press.
Berninger, V. W., Yates, C., Cartwright, A., Rutberg, J., Remy, E., & Abbott, R. (1992). Lower-level developmental skills in beginning writing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 257-280.
Berninger, V. (1999). Coordinating transcription and text generation in working memory during composing: Automatic and constructive processes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 99–112. doi:10.2307/1511269.
Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (1994). Is written language production more difficult than oral language production? A working memory approach. International Journal of Psychology, 29, 591–620. doi: 10.1080/00207599408248175
Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (2000). Is graphic activity cognitively costly? A developmental approach. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13, 183–196. doi: 10.1023/A:1026458102685
Broekkamp, H., & Van den Bergh, H. (1996). Attention strategies in revising a foreign language text. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. Van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Vol Eds.), Studies in Writing Vol. 2, Theories, models and methodology in writing research (pp. 170–181). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Chafe, W. (1988). Punctuation and the prosody of written language. Written Communication, 5(4), 396–426.
Caramazza, A., Miceli, G., Villa, G., & Romani, C. (1987). The role of graphemic buffer in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognition, 26, 59-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(87)90014-X
Carver, R. P. (1990). Reading rate: A Review of Research and Theory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Chenoweth, A., & Hayes, J. (2001). Fluency in Writing. Generating Text in L1 and L2. Written Communication Vol. 18, p. 80–98.
Christensen, C. A. (2004). Relationship between orthographic-motor integration and computer use for the production of creative and well structured written text. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), 551–565.
Crowhurst, M. (1980). The efect of syntactic complexity on writing quality: A review of research. ERIC document number ED202024. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED202024.pdf.
Coertjens, L. Lesterhuis, M., Verhavert, S., Gasse, R., & De Maeyer, S. (2018). Teksten beoordelen met criterialijsten of via paarsgewijze vergelijking: een afweging van betrouwbaarheid en tijdsinvestering. Retrieved from https://www.kennisdelingtaalbeleid.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Teksten-beoordelenmet-criterialijsten-of-via-paarsgewijze-vergelijking.-Een-afweging-van-betrouwbaarheid-entijdsinvestering.pdf.
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.
Comproved (2022). Comproved [computer software]. Antwerp: University of Antwerp. https://comproved.com/en/.
Connelly, Gee, & Walsh (2007). A comparison of keyboarded and handwritten compositions and the relationship with transcription speed. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 479–492.
Cox, B. E., Shanahan, T., & Sulzby, E. (1990). Good and Poor Elementary Readers’ Use of Cohesion in Writing. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(1), 47–65.
Cummins, Jim (2000). Language, Power and Pedagogy. Bilingual Children in the Crossfre. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Cutting, L. E., Materek, A.., Cole, C. A. S., Levine, T. M., & Mahone, E. M. (2009). Effects of fluency, oral language, and executive function on reading comprehension performance. Annals of Dyslexia, 59(1), 34–54.
Dansac, C., & Alamargot, D. (1999). Accessing referential information during text composition: When and why? In M. Torrance, & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 79–97). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
DeKeyser, R. M. (2007). Introduction: Situating the concept of practice. In R. M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 1–18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drechsel, B. & Artelt, C. (2007). Lesekompetenz. In M. Prenzel, C. Artelt, J. Baumert, W. Blum, M. Hammann, E. Klieme & R. Pekrun (Eds.), PISA 2006. Die Ergebnisse der dritten internationalen Vergleichsstudie (p. 225–247). Münster: Waxmann.
Donovan, C. A., & Smolkin, L. B. (2006). Children's Understanding of Genre and Writing Development. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 131–143). New York: The Guilford Press.
Dunn L.M. & Dunn, D.M. (2007). PPVT-4. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. German Version (2015): A. Lenhard, R. Segerer, W. Lenhard, & S. Suggate. Frankfurt/M.: Pearson.
Groen, M. A., Veenendaal, N. J., & Verhoeven, L. (2019). The role of prosody in reading comprehension: evidence from poor comprehenders. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(1), 37–57.
Fayol, M. (1999). From on-line management problems to strategies in written composition. In M. Torrance, & G. Jeffery (Vol. Eds.), Studies in writing, vol. 3: The cognitive demands of writing (p.13–23). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Fayol, M. & Lété, B. (2012). Contributions of online studies to understanding translation from ideas to written text. In M. Fayol, D. Alarmogot, & V. Berninger (Eds.), Translation of thoughts to written text while composing: Advancing theory, knowledge, methods, and applications (p. 289–313). New York: Psychology Press.
Flower, L. & Hayes, J. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling contraints. In L. W. Gregg, E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 31–50). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Fodor, J. (2002). Prosodic disambiguation in silent reading. In M. Hirotani, (Ed.), Proceedings of NELS 32 (p. 113–132). Amherst: GLSA Publications.
Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 39–50.
Frostig, M. (1961). Developmental Test of Visual Perception. Los Angeles: Marianne Frostig School of Educational Therapy.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K.., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5 (3), 239–256.
Glynn, S.M., Britton, B.K., Muth, K.D., & Dogan, N. (1982). Writing and revising persuasive documents: Cognitive demands, Journal of Educational Psychology 74, 557–567.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. RASE: Remedial & Special Education, 7(1), 6–10.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.. (2012). The role of strategies, knowledge, will, and skills in a 30 year program of research (with homage to Hayes, Fayol, and Boscolo). In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), Past, Present, and Future Contributions of Cognitive Writing Research to Cognitive Psychology (pp. 177–196). London: Psychology Press.
Groeben, N. & Christmann, U. (1996). Textverstehen und Textverständlichkeit aus sprach-/denkpsychologischer Sicht (p. 67–89). Tübingen: Narr.
Groen, M. A., Veenendaal, N. J., & Verhoeven, L. (2019). The role of prosody in reading comprehension: evidence from poor comprehenders. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(1), 37–57.
Godde, E., Bosse, ML., & Bailly, G. (2020). A review of reading prosody acquisition and development. Read Writ 33, 399–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09968-1
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London Routledge.
Hassin, R.R. (2005). Non-conscious control and implicit working memory. In R.R. Hassin, J.S. Uleman, & J.A. Bargh (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 196-225). New York: Oxford University Press.
Hayes, J. (2012a). Evidence From Language Bursts, Revision, and Transcription for Translation and its Relation to Other Writing Processes. In M. Fayol, D. Alamargot, & V. W. Berninger (Eds.), Translation of thought to written text while composing: Advancing theory, knowledge, methods, and applications (pp. 15–26). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
Hayes, J. (2012b). Modeling and Remodeling Writing. Written Communication 29(3), 369–388.
Hayes, J. R., & Chenoweth, N. A. (2006). Is working memory involved in the transcribing and editing of texts? Written Communication, 23(2), 135–149.
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg, E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Hayes JR, Ann Chenoweth N. (2007). Working Memory in an Editing Task. Written Communication. 24(4), 283–294. doi:10.1177/0741088307304826.
Hoover, W.A., & Gough, P.B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 127–160.
Hurschler-Lichtsteiner, S., Wicki, W., & Falmann, P. (2018). Impact of handwriting training on fluency, spelling and text quality among third graders. Reading and Writing, 31(6), 1295–1318. DOI: 10.1007/s11145-018-9825-x
Hurschler-Lichtsteiner, S. (2020) Differenzierende Beurteilung der Handschrift – ein Bestandteil der Schreibförderung. leseforum 3/2020
Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L. (2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 719–729.
Jones, D., & Christensen, C. A. (1999). The relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students’ ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 44–49.
Kaufer, D. S., Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. (1986). “Composing written sentences.” Research in the Teaching of English 20(2), 121–140.
Kellogg, R.T. (1987). Writing performance: Effects of cognitive strategies, Written Communication 4, 269–298.
Kellogg, R. T. (1994). The Psychology of Writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kellogg, R.T. (1999). Components of working memory in text production. In M. Torrance, & G. Jeffery (Vol. Eds.), Studies in writing, vol. 3: The cognitive demands of writing (p.43–61). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Kentner, G. (2012). Linguistic rhythm guides parsing decisions in written sentence comprehension. Cognition, 123, 1–20.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension. A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: University Press.
Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 310–321.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Koponen, M., & Riggenbach, H. (2000). Overview: Varying perspectives on fluency. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (p. 5–24). Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press Robinson.
Kuhn, M.R., & Stahl, S.A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 3–21.
Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Meisinger, E. B. (2010). Aligning Theory and Assessment of Reading Fluency: Automaticity, Prosody, and Definitions of Fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 230–251. DOI:10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. A. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
Lemke, V. (2021). Rechtschreiben beim Textschreiben. Zum Einfluss der Orthographie auf die Schreibflüssigkeit und die Qualität von Schülertexten. Münster: Waxmann. [Spelling during writing. On the influence of spelling on student’s writing fluency and text quality]
Lenhard, W. & Schneider, W. (2006). ELFE 1-6. Ein Leseverständnistest für Erst- bis Sechstklässler. Götingen: Hogrefe.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge, London: M.I.T. Press.
Levinson, S. C. (2000), Presumptive meanings. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.
Limpo, T., & Alves, R. A. (2013). Modeling writing development: Contribution of transcription and self-regulation to portuguese students’ text generation quality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 401–413. doi: 10.1037/a0031391
Limpo, T., & Alves, R. A. (2017). Written language bursts mediate the relationship between transcription skills and writing performance. Written Communication, 34(3), 306–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088317714234
Linnemann, M. (2019). Anticipation of audience during writing. In E. Lindgren, & K. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing: insights from keystroke logging (p. 327–345). Leiden: Brill.
MacArthur, C. A., Jennings, A., & Philippakos, Z. A. (2019). Which linguistic features predict quality of argumentative writing for college basic writers, and how do those features change with instruction? Reading and Writing, 32(6), 1553–1574.
Mahrhofer, C. (2004). Schreibenlernen mit graphomotorisch vereinfachten Schreibvorgaben. Eine experimentelle Studie zum Erwerb der verbundenen Ausgangsschrift in der 1. und 2. Jahrgangsstufe. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
Matsuhashi, A. (1981). Pausing and Planning: The Tempo of Written Discourse Production. Research in the Teaching of English, 15(2), 113–134.
McCutchen, D. (2011). From Novice to Expert: Implications of Language Skills and Writing-Relevant Knowledge for Memory during the Delevopment of Writing Skill. Journal of Writing Research, 3 (1), 51–68.
McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review 8, 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01464076
McCutchen, D., Covill, A., Hoyne, S. H., & Mildes, K. (1994). Individual differences in writing: Implications of translating fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 256–266.
Monteiro, C., & Leal, J. P. (2013). Managing experiments on cognitive processes in writing with Handspy. ComSIS, 10, 1747–1773. doi: 10.2298/CSIS121130061M
Müller, B. & Richter, T. (2014). Lesekompetenz. In J. Grabowski (Ed.), Sinn und Unsinn von Kompetenzen. Fähigkeitskonzepte im Bereich von Sprache, Medien und Kultur (p. 51–71). Opladen: Budrich.
Nottbusch, G. (2017). Graphomotorik. In M. Becker-Mrotzek, J. Grabowski & T. Steinhoff (Eds.), Forschungshandbuch empirische Schreibdidaktik (p. 125–138). Münster: Waxmann.
Odersky, E. (2018). Handschrift und Automatisierung des Handschreibens. Eine Evaluation von Kinderschriften im 4. Schuljahr. Berlin: J. B. Metzler.
Olive T. (2014). Toward a parallel and cascading model of the writing system: A review of research on writing processes coordination. Journal of Writing Research, 6(2), 141–71
Olive, T., & Cislaru, G. (2015). Linguistic forms at the process-product interface: Analysing the linguistic content of burst production. In G. Cislaru (Ed.), Writing at the crossroads. The process-product interface. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2002). Concurrent activation of high- and low-level production processes in written composition. Memory and Cognition, 30(4), 594–600. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194960
Paige, D. D., Rupley, W. H., Smith, G. S., Rasinski, T. V., Nichols, W., & Magpuri-Lavell, T. (2017). Is prosodic reading a strategy for comprehension? Journal for educational research online, 9(2), 245–275.
Parodi, G. (2007). Reading-writing connections: discourse-oriented research. Reading and Writing, 20, 225–250.
Perfetti, C. (1985). Reading Ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L.Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy. (p. 189–213). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Pollitt, A. (2012a). Comparative judgement for assessment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9189-x.
Pollitt, A. (2012b). The method of adaptive comparative judgement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(3), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.665354.
Rasinski, T. (2004): Creating fluent readers. Educational Leadership, 61(6), 46–51.
Rasinski, T., Padak, N. D., McKeon, C. A., Wilfong, L. G., Friedauer, J. A., & Heim P. (2005). Is reading fluency a key for successful high school reading? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(1), 22–27.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511732942.
Rosebrock, C., Nix, D., Rieckmann, C. & Gold, A. (2011). Leseflüssigkeit fördern. Lautleseverfahren für die Primar‐ und Sekundarstufe. Seelze: Kallmeyer.
Samuels, S. J. (1994). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading, revisited. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (p. 816–837). Newark: International Reading Association.
Santangelo, Tanya, & Graham, Steve (2016): A Comprehensive Meta-analysis of Handwriting Instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 225–265.
Sappok, C., Linnemann, M. & Stephany, S. (2020). Leseflüssigkeit – Prosodie – Leseverstehen. Eine Longitudinalstudie zur Entwicklung der Leseflüssigkeit von Jahrgangstufe 3 bis 7. In I. Rautenberg (Eds.), Evidenzbasierte Forschung zum Schriftspracherwerb (p. 175–209). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider-Verlag Hohengehren.
Schneider, W., Schlagmüller, M. & Ennemoser, M. (2007). LGVT 6-12. Lesegeschwindigkeits- und -verständnistest für die Klassen 6-12. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Schneider W. & Shiffrin R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing 1: Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.
Schnotz, W. & Dutke, S. (2004). Kognitionspsychologische Grundlagen der Lesekompetenz: Mehrebenenverarbeitung anhand multipler Informationsquellen. In C. Artelt, U. Schiefele, W. Schneider & P. Stanat (Eds.), Entwicklung, Bedingungen und Förderung der Lesekompetenz Jugendlicher. Vertiefende Analysen der PISA-2000-Daten (p. 61–100). Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Schmidt, R. (2000). Foreword. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (p. i–vii). United States of America: The University of Michigan Press.
Schmitt, M. (2022). Perspektivenübernahme und Schreibkompetenz, In M. Becker-Mrotzek & J. Grabowski (Eds.) Schreibkompetenz in der Sekundarstufe Theorie, Diagnose und Förderung (pp. 57–72). Münster: Waxmann.
Segalowitz, N. (2003a). Automaticity and Second Languages. In C. Doughty, & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 382–408). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Segalowitz, N. (2003b). Automaticity and Attentional Skill in Fluent Performance. In H. Riggenbach (Eds.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 200–219). United States of America: The University of Michigan Press.
Shanahan, T. (1984). Nature of the reading-writing relation: an exploratory multivariate analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 466–477
Shanahan, T. (2006). Relations among oral language, reading, and writing development. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham &, J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (p. 171–183). London: The Guilford Press.
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Meisinger, E. B., Wisenbaker, J. M., Kuhn, M. R., Strauss, G. P., & Morris, R. D. (2006). Becoming a fluent and automatic reader in the early elementary school years. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(4), 496–522.
Stephany, S., Lemke, V., Linnemann, M., Goltsev, E., Bulut, N., Claes, P., Roth, H.J. & Becker-Mrotzek, M. (2020). Lese- und Schreibflüssigkeit diagnostizieren und fördern. In C. Titz, S. Geyer, A. Ropeter, H. Wagner, S. Weber und M. Hasselhorn (Hrsg.), Sprach- und Schriftsprachförderung wirksam gestalten: Innovative Konzepte und Forschungsimpulse (p. 156-181). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Stephany, S., Linnemann, Goltsev, E. & Becker-Mrotzek, M. (2021). Prosodische Aspekte der Leseflüssigkeit als Indikator für Lesekompetenz – Analysen mithilfe prosodischer Lupenstellen. In S. Gailberger & C. Sappok, (Eds.): Weiterführende Grundlagenforschung in der empirischen Leseforschung und Lesedidaktik. Theorie – Empirie – Didaktik. Reihe „Thema Sprache - Wissenschaft für den Unterricht“. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.
Stephany, S., Linnemann, M., Lemke, V., Goltsev, E., Bulut, N., Claes, P., Krause-Wolters, M., Haider, H., Roth, H. J. & Becker-Mrotzek, M. (o.J.). Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse aus dem BMBF-Projekt Lese- und Schreibflüssigkeit: Konzeption, Diagnostik, Förderung. Unveröffentlichtes Manuscript, University of Cologne.
Sturm, A. (2016). Observing writing processes of struggling adult writers with collaborative writing. Journal of Writing Research, 8(2), 301–344. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2016.08.02.05.
Sturm, A.. & Schneider, H. (2021). Flüssiges Formulieren in der Textproduktion (Klasse 4/5). Didaktik Deutsch, 26 (51), 28–49.
Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Traxler, M. J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1992). Improving written communication through minimal feedback. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, 1–22.
Traxler, M. J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1993). Improving written communication through perspective taking. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8 (3), 311–334.
Traxler, M. J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1995). Improving coherence in written communication. In M. A. Gernsbacher, & T. Givón (Eds.), Coherence in spontaneous text (pp. 216–237). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Tierney, R. J., & Shanahan, T. (1996). Research on the reading-writing relationship: interactions, transactions, and outcomes. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (p. 246–280). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Torrance, M., & Galbraith, D. (2008). The processing demands of writing. In: C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 67–82). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Torrance M., & Jeffery, G. (1999). Writing processes and cognitive demands. In M. Torrance, & G. Jeffery (Vol. Eds.), Studies in writing, vol. 3: The cognitive demands of writing (p.1–11). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
van den Plaats, R.E., & van Galen, G.P. (1990). Effects of spatial and motor demands in handwriting. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 361–380.
van Galen, G. P. (1991). Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory. Human Movement Science, 10 (2–3), 165–191. doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(91)90003-G.
van Wijk, C. (1999). Conceptual processes in argumentation: a developmental perspective. In G. Rijlaarsdam, & E. Espéret (Series Eds), & M. Torrance, & D. Galbraith (Vol. Eds), Studies in Writing: Vol 4. Knowing what to write: conceptual processes in text production (pp.31–50). Amsterdam. Amsterdam University Press.
Veenendaal, N. J., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). What oral text reading fluency can reveal about reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(3), 213–225.
Vitevitch, M. S., Chan, K. Y., & Roodenrys, S. (2012). Complex network structure influences processing in long-term and short-term memory. Journal of memory and language, 67, 30–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.
Weinzierl, C. (2022). Kohärenzmanagement und Schreibkompetenz. In M. Becker-Mrotzek, & J. Grabowski (Eds.). Schreibkompetenz in der Sekundarstufe: Theorie, Diagnose und Förderung (pp. 73–95). Münster: Waxmann.
Wicki, W., Hurschler Lichtsteiner, S., Saxer Geiger, A., & Müller, M. (2014). Handwriting fluency in children: Impact and correlates. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 73, 87–96.
Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 211–238.
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H.-Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Wolters, A.P., Kim Y.G., & Szura, J.W. (2022). Is Reading Prosody Related to Reading Comprehension? A Meta-analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26, 1, 1–20, DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2020.1850733
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Markus Linnemann, Sabine Stephany, Valerie Lemke, Necle Bulut, Hilde Haider, Hans-Joachim Roth, Michael Becher-Mrotzek
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
