Thinking outside the box: Senior scientists’ metacognitive strategy knowledge and self-regulation of writing for science communication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2023.15.02.04Keywords:
self-regulation, writing regulation, metacognition, Science dissemination, scientific writingAbstract
Academics are increasingly engaged in writing genres with purposes and for readers outside of academia—a variety of science-based communication practices that fall under the term science communication. These practices often span different modes, genres, and even languages, requiring high degrees of rhetorical flexibility, strategic knowledge, and regulation of writing. In this study, we probe the self-regulation and specifically the metacognitive strategy knowledge (MSK) of seven senior scientists who regularly and actively engage with writing for science communication. We argue that understanding their MSK can illuminate how strategic knowledge is transferred across written genres, and importantly offer useful insights for the training of future scientists. Using data derived from in-depth, narrative interviews with a recall component, we identify a variety of strategies for task conceptualization/analysis, planning and goal setting, monitoring, and evaluating the writing of different genres. Task analysis appears particularly crucial in science communication writing, due to the great variety of purposes and readers that fall under this umbrella. Interestingly, our participants underscore storytelling strategies, and seem to transfer language and style monitoring strategies to and from science communication and publication. We map the strategies identified and discuss the implications of our study for further research and science communication pedagogy.
References
Ampollini, I., & Bucchi. M. (2020). When public discourse mirrors academic debate: Research integrity in the media. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26 (1): 451–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00103-5.
Barkhuizen, G. (2015). Narrative Knowledging in Second Language Teaching and Learning Contexts. The Handbook of Narrative Analysis, 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118458204.ch5
Baram-Tsabari, A., & Lewenstein, B. v. (2017). Science communication training: what are we trying to teach? International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 7(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2017.1303756
Beaufort, A., & Iñesta, A. (2014). Author profiles: Awareness, competence, and skills. In E. -M. Jakobs & D. Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (pp. 142-158). Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220674.141
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812310
Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1993). Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written communication, 10(4), 475-509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010004001
Bohlin, G., & Bergman, M. (2019). Jag vill men hinner inte! Forskares syn på kommunikation och Öppen vetenskap, Nationell enkätundersökning [I want to but I do not have time! Researchers’ views on communication and open science in Sweden]. https://www.v-a.se/downloads/varapport2019_8.pdf
Bragesjö, F., Elzinga, A., & Kasperowski, D. (2012). Continuity or discontinuity? Scientific governance in the pre-history of the 1977 law of higher education and research in Sweden. Minerva, 50(1), 65–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-012-9188-4
Bucchi, M., (2019). A Paper is like a Horse – and a Book is like a Whale? Sociologica, (3)1, 9-11. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/9379
Bucchi, M. (1996). When scientists turn to the public: alternative routes in science communication. Public Understanding of Science, 5(4), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/5/4/005
Castelló, M., Iñesta, A., & Corcelles, M. (2013). Learning to write a research article: Ph.D. students’ transitions toward disciplinary writing regulation. Research in the Teaching of English, 47(4), 442–477. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24397847
Cervin-Ellqvist, M. (2022). (Re)harmonising the Academy: Integrating life-long learning and science communication in Swedish higher education. Licentiate thesis. Chalmers University of Technology. https://research.chalmers.se/publication/533644
Cheng, A. (2007). Transferring generic features and recontextualizing genre awareness: Understanding writing performance in the ESP genre-based literacy framework. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.12.002
Cumming, A. (2020). L2 writing and L2 learning: Transfer, self-regulation, and identities. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning: Advancing research agendas (pp. 29-48). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56.02cum
Dahlstrom, M. F. (2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (supplement_4), 13614–13620. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320645111
Davies, S. R. (2020). An Empirical and Conceptual Note on Science Communication’s Role in Society. Science Communication, 43(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020971642
Defazio, D., Kolympiris, C., Perkmann, M., & Salter, A. (2020). Busy academics share less: the impact of professional and family roles on academic withholding behaviour. Studies in Higher Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1793931
Devitt, A. J. (2015). Genre performances: John Swales’ Genre Analysis and rhetorical-linguistic genre studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.008
Driscoll, D. L.; Paszek, J., Gorzelsky, G., Hayes, C.L., & Jones, E. (2019). Genre knowledge and writing development: Results from the writing transfer project. Written Communication,1-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319882313
Dryler, H., Nordström, K., Stening, E., & Boman, U. (2022). Karriärvägar och meriteringssystem i högskolan [Career paths and qualification systems in the university].https://www.uka.se/download/18.6151a0a217f44b5c9f57d6d/1648029881213/rapport-2022-03-15-karriarvagar-och-meriteringssystem-i-hogskolan-redovisning-av-ett-regeringsuppdrag.pdf
Emerson, L. (2017). The forgotten tribe: Scientists as writers. he WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doil.org/10.37514/PER-B.2016.0759
Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal Learning and Tacit Knowledge in Professional Work. British Journal of Educational Psychology 70, 113–136 https://doi.org/10.1348/000709900158001
Fahnestock, J. (2020). Rhetorical Citizenship and the Science of Science Communication. Argumentation, 34, 371-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-019-09499-7
Florence, M. K., & Yore, L. D. (2004). Learning to write like a scientist: Coauthoring as an enculturation task. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 637–668. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20015
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College composition and communication, 31, 21–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/356630
Galbraith, D. & Baaijen, V. M. (2018) The work of writing: Raiding the inarticulate. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 238-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1505515
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606006
Graham, S., Gillespie, A., & McKeown, D. (2013). Writing: Importance, development, and instruction. Reading and Writing, 26, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9395-2
Hacker, D. J. (2018): A Metacognitive model of writing: An update from a developmental perspective. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 220-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1480373
Hadwin, A. Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2018). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed. pp. 83–137). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048-6
Hetland, P., Kasperowski, D., & Nielsen, K. H. (2020). Denmark, Norway and Sweden: Share, make useful and critically discuss: Science communication. Communicating Science: A Global Perspective, 253–278. https://doi.org/10.22459/cs.2020.11
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
Jonsson, A., & Grafström, M. (2021). Rethinking science communication: reflections on what happens when science meets comic art. Journal of Science Communication, 20(02), Y01. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20020401
Kang, J. (2022). Transfer of knowledge across genres and media: Investigating L2 learners’ multiple composing practices. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101096
Karlen, Y. (2017). The development of a new instrument to assess metacognitive strategy knowledge about academic writing and its relation to self-regulated writing and writing performance. Journal of Writing Research, 9(1), 61–86. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2017.09.01.03
Karlen, Y., & Compagnoni, M. (2017). Implicit Theory of Writing Ability: Relationship to Metacognitive Strategy Knowledge and Strategy Use in Academic Writing. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 16(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725716682887
Kellogg, R. T., & Whiteford, A. P. (2009). Training advanced writing skills: The case for deliberate practice. Educational Psychologist, 44(4), 250-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903213600
Kessler, M. (2021). The longitudinal development of second language writers’ metacognitive genre awareness. Journal of Second Language Writing, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100832
Luzón, M. J., & Pérez-Llantada, C. (2019). Science communication on the internet: old genres meet new genres. John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.6035/languagev.6664
Mason, S., & Merga, M. (2021). Communicating research in academia and beyond: sources of self-efficacy for early career researchers. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(6), 2006–2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1945545
Mellor, F., (2018). Review: The Oxford handbook of the science of science communication. Public understanding of science 27(6): 750–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518779838
Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Kuchel, L. (2017). Core Skills for Effective Science Communication: A Teaching Resource for Undergraduate Science Education. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 7(2), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2015.1113573
Miles, M.B., Huberman, M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. Sage.
Negretti, R. (2021). Searching for metacognitive generalities: Areas of convergence in learning to write for publication across doctoral students in science and engineering. Written Communication, 38(2), 167-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320984796
Negretti, R., Persson, M., & Sjöberg-Hawke, C., (2022). Science stories: Researchers’ experiences of writing science communication and the implications for training future scientists. Published online April 15 2022. International Journal of Science Education – Part B, communication and public engagement, 12(3), 203-220 https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2022.2060530
Negretti, R., & McGrath, L. (2018). Scaffolding genre knowledge and metacognition: insights from an L2 doctoral research writing course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40(June), 12-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.12.002
Ohtani, K., & Hisasaka, T. (2018). Beyond intelligence: A meta-analytic review of the relationship among metacognition, intelligence, and academic perfor-mance. Metacognition and Learning, 13(2), 179–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-018-9183-8
Perrault, S. (2013). Communicating popular science: From deficit to democracy. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137017581
Pérez-Llantada, C. (2021a). Genres and languages in science communication: The multiple dimensions of the science-policy interface. Language & Communication, 78, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2021.02.004
Pérez-Llantada, C. (2021b). Research genres across languages: Multilingual communi-cation online. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108870528
Polanyi, M. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. Knowledge in Organisations, 135–146. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-7506-9718-7.50010-x
Qin, L., & Jun Zhang, L. (2019). English as a foreign language writers’ metacognitive strategy knowledge of writing and their writing performance in multimedia environments. Journal of Writing Research, 11(2), 393–413. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.06
Reid, G. (2019). Compressing, expanding, and attending to scientific meaning: Writing the semiotic hybrid of science for professional and citizen scientists. Written Communication, 36(1), 68-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088318809361
Renwick, K., Selkrig, M., Manathunga, C., & Keamy, R. “Kim.” (2020). Community engagement is … : Revisiting Boyer’s model of scholarship. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(6), 1232-1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1712680
Roderick, R. (2019). Self-Regulation and Rhetorical Problem Solving: How Graduate Students Adapt to an Unfamiliar Writing Project. Written Communication, 36(3), 410–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319843511
Russell Bernard, H. (2013). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. SAGE.
Said, Edward W. (1995). Representation of the Intellectual. New York: Random House Inc.
Sala-Bubaré, A., & Castelló, M. (2018). Writing regulation processes in higher education: A review of two decades of empirical research. Reading and Writing, 31, 757–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9808-3
Sala-Bubaré, A., Castelló, M., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2021). Writing processes as situated regulation processes: A context-based approach to doctoral writing. Journal of Writing Research, 13(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2021.13.01.01
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. (1996). Occluded genres in the academy: the case of the submission letter. In E. Ventola and A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing intercultural and textual issues (pp. 45-58). John Bejamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.41.06swa
Swales, J.M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524827
Tardy, C. M. (2021). The potential power of play in second language academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 53, 100833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100833
Tardy, C. M. (2005). “It’s like a story”: Rhetorical knowledge development in advanced academic literacy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(4), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.005
Tardy, C. M., Sommer-Farias, B. & Gevers, J. (2020). Teaching and Researching Genre Knowledge: Toward an Enhanced Theoretical Framework. Written Communication, 3(2), 287–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320916554
Watermeyer, R. (2016) Public intellectuals vs. new public management: The defeat of public engagement in higher education, Studies in Higher Education, 41:12, 2271-2285, doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1034261
Wei, X. (2020). Assessing the metacognitive awareness relevant to L1-to-L2 rhetorical transfer in L2 writing: The cases of Chinese EFL writers across proficiency levels. Assessing Writing, 44,100452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100452.
Wenden, A. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics 19: 515–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.4.515
Wenden, A. (1991). Metacognitive strategies in L2 writing: A case for task knowledge. In J. E. Atlis (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics (GURT) 1991: Linguistics and Language Pedagogy: The State of the Art, (pp. 302-322). Georgetown University Press.
Yore, L. D., Hand, B. M., & Prain, V. (2002). Scientists as writers. Science Education, 86(5), 672-692. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10042
Zhang, D., Zhang, L.J. (2019). Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) in Second/Foreign Language Teaching. In: Gao, X. (eds) Second Handbook of English Language Teaching (pp. 883-897). Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_47
Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In Handbook of metacognition in education. (pp. 299–315). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876428
Zimmerman, B. J., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(1), 73-101. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0919
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Raffaella Negretti, Carina Sjöberg-Hawke, Maria Persson, Maria Cervin-Ellqvist
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
